Confirmed one-page long-tail and no-doorway rules already exist in .cursor/rules; conversation only expanded with Omni examples.

Date: 2026-08-08 23:03 Summary: Confirmed one-page long-tail and no-doorway rules already exist in .cursor/rules; conversation only expanded with Omni examples.

[question] 这些是否在规则里面已经包含

[try to solve] Yes—the core principles are already in rules. Authoritative locations:

seo-google-policy.mdc: Doorway ban on title/H1-only variants; long-tail default is one page covering many scenarios; scaled content ban on near-synonym URL floods
tool-i18n-seo.mdc (long-tail / page-split section): default Use cases+FAQ coverage; split criteria; three self-check questions; ban hollow variants
tool-creation.mdc: H2 Use cases prefer long-tail over URL splits; checklist item to put long-tail in Use cases/FAQ; ban visible meta-narration about not splitting URLs
tool-i18n-localization.mdc: secondary terms in desc/FAQ/Use cases; ban near-synonym URL splits for keyword stuffing; merge thin synonym-slug pages into one multi-scenario page
work-tasks-tool-brief.mdc: ban near-synonym long-tail URL splits without ready briefs
.github/copilot-instructions.md: summary that long-tail defaults to one page covering many scenarios

Conversation-only additions not required in rules: Omni-specific counterexamples (bmi-men, 90/95/99 CI, etc.), section-by-section long-tail narrative, Bing crawl-waste wording—strategy/competitor notes; only promote into rules if an Omni-dedicated chapter is wanted.

[actions]

No code changes

Confirmed one-page long-tail and no-doorway rules already exist in .cursor/rules; conversation only expanded with Omni examples. | Dev Logs