Date: 2026-08-06 21:04 Summary: Yes — cursor/rules already encode one-language factual master plus per-locale search-oriented rewrite at master quality; “fact card” is implicit via the master lang, not a separate named artifact.
[question] 目前cursor/rules是否采用“一份事实母版 + 十语都按母版质量做检索向重写”规则
[try to solve] Yes in substance. The wording is “one master language + independent rewrite per locale from its brief,” not a separately named “fact card” file.
Where it lands in rules
| File | Mapping |
|---|---|
tool-i18n-localization.mdc step 1 |
One master: usually en or zh, full How/Rules/Example/Use cases/FAQ/UI |
| Same file step 2 + writing guidance | Ten-locale master-quality rewrite: independent rewrite from each brief; no Translate; anti-isomorphism |
tool-creation.mdc / work-tasks-tool-brief.mdc |
03-locale-briefs before implement; steady path: one master lang → per-locale rewrite → ≥3 rounds |
tool-i18n-seo.mdc IG⑦ |
Search-oriented rewrite per locale; forbid “master + script dump remaining locales” isomorphic delivery |
seo-google-policy.mdc |
scaled content → brief + search-oriented rewrite + ≥3 rounds |
Implied but not spelled out
- No separate “fact card” artifact name; master-language copy = fact/IG source.
- No line-by-line “other locales must not change formula/disclaimer facts,” but the flow is rewrite expression, not invent a new fact system; YMYL/boundaries land via complete master keys.
Explicitly opposed
- Ten locales as unrelated factual masters: not encouraged.
- “Master final → script dump eight locales”: explicitly forbidden.
Bottom line: Rules already follow this model. To harden “facts must not drift,” localization could add: other locales may change search wording and FAQ order, but must not change formulas / default behavior / disclaimer facts — clarity enhancement, not a model change.
[actions]
- Checked localization / creation / i18n-seo / work-tasks / google-policy; no file changes